Utilitarianism and Kant's Moral.

The utilitarianism principle states that we should do what produces the most gratification for the greatest governance issue of pile. With this in mind, we would be able to make a just decision based on the amount of happiness it brings to others. To decl ar of it as a consequential moral possibility mover you argon focusing more on the certain expiry of your actions and not the reason behind doing them. An example would be the suicide bar mentioned in chapter four. Suppose that some of the people load-bearing(a) the idea of building the suicide obstruction were the people that are going to get paid and make profit when it is built, thus the reason they support it so strongly. Just because they make a large profit off the erection of the suicide barrier doesnt mean they are wrong, they palliate are possibly saving(a) peoples lives no matter what their motives for building the barrier may be. So, art object the reason behind the want may not be as ethical, the resu lts are the same no matter what. My entirely objection to the utilitarianism concept is that while it may make the push-down hark majority of the group happy with the situation, what about the rest of them that dont apparel? Suppose that two tercets of the community were strong supporters of building a suicide barrier, stating that it would save peoples lives by not making it so easy to jump off. On the other hand, the remaining tierce of the community state that if someone wants to commit suicide whence they are going to find a way no matter what kind of barriers you put up. Instead of wasting the bills on a suicide barrier, they would rather spend that property on a new school or lane repairs. That still leaves a... If you want to get a full essay, ready it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper